Pretty wonderful that a car flipped at highway speeds and no one was critically harm. Are any fees pending against the horse proprietor? I do not need to forged aspersions with out evidence, so I won't name the enterprise, but it surely appears fairly obvious a guess that the horses had been at a sure ranch and escaped. If that's the case, the house owners probably board them there and the responsibility belongs with the ranch. Is probably not the proprietor's/house owners' fault. Yes, the vast majority of horses in the realm are boarded, not stabled on horse proprietor property. Fairly terrible time for those drivers, although. That is awful, & it may've been even worse. The property on both sides belongs to Stanford U. PVEC is a bunch of sub-barns and there may be at the very least cheap horse statue life size one if not more further operations farther up Ansel Lane. 280 the horses would have come from. Might you imagine that someone supposed their horses to be killed on the freeway? Too bad it took the CHP an hour to forged the SIG alert - it seems they didn't react in time to prevent continuing tragedy? Only for the file they didn't come from PVTC! So forged all of the aspersions you like! I didn't "blame" anybody, nor did I "imagine" somebody wished harm, be aware my use of the phrase "escape". I still doubt that will be the case. I used to be referring to @wonderful that thought the homeowners would be liable. As for my guess, after wanting on the map, I am glad I didn't say the title, the one I was guessing is on the south facet of 280, with the long lease. You'd need greater than a handful of fingers to rely. My error stems from being a north peninsula gal, I nonetheless think of 280 as north/south! The news reported this morning that they acquired free from Webb Ranch. I am extra familiar with the south aspect stables; I have no idea which is the most obvious (ie.. Somebody thought they had latched a gate, but hadn't. The SJ Mercury Information reviews that they wandered a mile from the corral the place a gate was left unfastened. Mea culpa -- I used to be reacting defensively in protection of the ranch I rode at as a child (WR) which is on the "south" aspect of 280. From what I know, all their horses are additionally on the alternative aspect of the creek from the 280 north on- ramp. There are going to be a number of unhappy children in addition to us adult horse lovers. I'm feeling very bad for the ranch and all the children who rode those horses in classes. I am not feeling as dangerous for the ranch house owners & youngsters who rode the horses as I'm feeling for the horses themselves & the poor individuals who hit them. Glad no human lives have been misplaced and really sad for the lack of the horses. Sorry for my reactivity in earlier submit. Surprised anyone would blame the horse owners. Hazards like deer (and, in the past, horses and cattle and even pedestrians and stalled automobiles) seem on 280. I try not to drive within the shoulder lane, particularly at night time, to provide myself more room to maneuver should a deer certain into the roadway. Many people use 280 as a speedway! What are they going to do if they hit a deer - sue the deer? I'm a very long time Woodside and Portola Valley Resident. For the past 15 years I have had purpose to be on the 280 between the hours of 4:30-6:30am and that i can tell you not many maintain the speed restrict. Speed and over driving the reach of headlights are probably culprits, so please don't blame the poor horses and their house owners. It is as if drivers think that few drivers on the freeway make it the Autobahn! They should treat it as if they're driving in icy circumstances - Slow down. The speed limit is set because the safe speed underneath ideal conditions, which incorporates daylight, something less than splendid requires slower speeds. Perhaps if the CHP would spend extra time in the early hours monitoring traffic we'd have less gridlock that begins with wildlife (or relatively just lately domesticated animals) being hit and killed.
